Organisasi Advokat Pasca Surat Ketua MA Nomor 73/KMA/HK.01/IX/2015

Muhammad Nurcholis Alhadi

doi:10.46839/lljih.v11i1.485

Organisasi Advokat Pasca Surat Ketua MA Nomor 73/KMA/HK.01/IX/2015

Muhammad Nurcholis Alhadi

Abstract

The division among the lawyer organizations has led them to claim themselves as the leaders of the organization. This division also affects who has the right to appoint and swear in lawyers. The letter from the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court Number 73/KMA/HK.01/IX/2015 has provided a new direction in the management of the advocate organization in Indonesia. This letter reaffirms the principle of non-intervention by the Supreme Court in internal disputes of the law organization while also strengthening the principle of independence in the legal profession. However, the impact has given rise to various interpretations regarding the structure and regulation of the ideal lawyer organization. This research aims to analyze the impact of the letter on the dynamics of the lawyer organization, both from legal, institutional, and professional aspects. Through a juridical-normative approach and analysis of secondary data, this research identifies the challenges and opportunities faced by advocacy organizations following the issuance of the letter. The research findings indicate that this letter encourages lawyer organizations to be more independent in resolving internal conflicts, but on the other hand, it creates doubts about the mechanisms of oversight and professional accountability. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen regulations that can bridge the interests of the parties to maintain the integrity of the legal profession in Indonesia.

Keywords

Advocate Organization; Chief Justice's Letter; Legal Quality

Full Text:

PDF

References

Kamal, Andre Nasrul. (2016). Tinjauan Maqashid Al-Syariah terhadap Surat Ketua Mahkamah Agung No. 73/KMA/HK.01/IX/2015 tentang Penyumpahan Advokat (UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya)

Mahfud MD, Moh. 2016. Geger Advokat. Koran Sndo.

Muchti, Fajar dan Achmad. 2009. Yulianto, Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif & Empiris. (Pustaka Pelajar).

Pangaribuan, Luhut. 2017. Peran Organisasi Advokat dalam Menghasilkan Advokat yang Kompeten, Berintegritas dan Profesional, Seminar HKPM, Jakarta.

Pradjonggo, Tjandra Sridjaja. 2016. Dampak diterbitkannya Surat edaran Ketua MA Nomor 73/KMA/HK.01/IX/2015 tentang Penyumpahan Advokat terhadap Profesi Advokat di Indonesia. Maksigama Jurnal Hukum.

Pusat Kajian Hukum Konstitusi FH UJB. (2010). Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 101/Puu-Vii/2009 terhadap Pelaksanaan Profesi Advokat di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Jurnal Konstitusi. 7(6).

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia No. 101/PUU-VII/2009. Mahkamah Konstitusi.

Setiawan, Arif et al. 2001. Perbandingan Pengatura Penyelenggara Pendidikan Profesi Advokat di Indonesia dan Amerika Serikat. Arena Hukum. 10(1).

Soekanto, Soerjono. 1986. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. UI Press.

Solehudin. (2011). Quo Vadis Indepedensi Advokat dalam Sistem Peradilan di Indonesia. Perspektif. 16(2).

Suharsimi dan Arikunto. 1996. Prosedur Penelitian, Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Rineka Cipta.

Suhayati, Monika. (2015). Pengaturan Sistem Organisasi Advokat dalam RUU Tentang perubahan Undang-Undang Nomor 18 Tahun 2003 tentang Advokat. 20(4). 318.

Undang-Undang Nomor 18 Tahun 2003 tentang Advokat.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46839/lljih.v11i1.485