ANALISIS KOMPARATIF SISTEM PEMBUKTIAN KARTEL INDONESIA DAN MALAYSIA DI ERA MEA DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PERSAINGAN USAHA

Danar Aswim

Abstract


The writing of this title is motivated by the inconsistency of cartel according to Law no. 5 year 1999, then the writer compares it with Competition Act 2010 to see conformity about cartel concept and its proof system. The writing of this law raised the problem of how the system of proof of cartel based on the nature of the ban according to Law no. 5 of 1999 and the Competition Act 2010 in Malaysia, as well as how the juridical implications of the differences and the nature of the cartel ban between Law no. 5 of 1999 and the 2010 Competition Act with respect to MEA. Law no. 5 of 1999 and the 2010 Competition Act, there are differences in the nature of the prohibition to prove the existence of indications of alleged monopolistic practice of cartel. The scope and nature of the prohibition of cartel causes legal uncertainty and the failure of the MEA objectives in the business competition law to strengthen a healthy competition culture.

Keywords


Comparative; Cartel; Nature of prohibition; Evidence; Indonesia and Malaysia

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adi Nugroho, Susanti. Hukum Persaingan Usaha Di Indonesia (Dalam Teori dan Praktik serta Penerapan Hukumnya), Kencana, Jakarta, (2014).

Andi Fahmi Lubis, Bukti tidak langsung (Indirect Evidence) dan penerapannya dalam hukum persaingan usaha, Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Vol. 32 - No. 5 Tahun 2013, Universitas Indonesia

Association of Southeast Asian Nation, Asean Economic Comunity Blueprint, Direktorat Jendral Kerjasama ASEAN Depaetemen Luar Negeri RI, (2009).

BAPPEDA Kabupaten Malang. (2015) Kabupaten Malang Menuju MEA, Malang : Bappeda Kabupaten Malang.

Fuady, Munir, Perbandingan Ilmu Hukum, PT. Refika Aditama, Bandung, (2010).

LEE, Casey. Competition Law Enforcement inMalaysia : Some Recent Development, ERIA Discussion Paper, http://www.eria.org/ERIA-DP-2014-02.pdf. (2014)

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud, Penelitian Hukum, Kencana, Jakarta, (2014).

Nur Widhiyanti, Hanif. Peraturan Perjanjian Pakatan Sulit dalam Undang-Undang Persaingan di Indonesia, Kajian Perbandingan Indonesia dan Malaysia, Disertasi, Tidak diterbitkan, Fakulti Undang-Undang, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, (2015).

Undang-Undang No. 5 tahun 1999 Tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat.

Undang-Undang Malaysia Akta 712 “Akta Persaingan 2010”

Putusan KPPU Perkara Nomor 08/KPPU- I/2014 Tentang kartel ban kendaraan bermotor roda empat.

Putusan KPPU Perkara Nomor: 30/KPPU-L/2010 Kasus Tender 6 (Enam) Paket Pekerjaan di Lingkungan Unit Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa (UPBJ) Pemerintah Kabupaten Lingga Tahun Anggaran 2009.

Putusan KPPU Perkara Nomor 24/KPPU-I/2009 Tentang industri minyak goreng sawit di Indonesia.

Putusan KPPU Perkara Nomor: 25/KPPU-I/2009 Tentang Penetapan Harga Fuel Surcharge Dalam Industri Jasa Penerbangan Domestik.

Putusan KPPU Perkara Nomor No. 11/KPPU-I/2005 Tentang perkara distribusi semen Gresik.

Putusan KPPU Perkara Nomor 53/KPPU-L/2008 Tentang putusan atas kasus perjanjian pembagian wilayah oleh Asosiasi Kontraktor Listrik dan Mekanikal Indonesia (AKLI) di wilayah Sulawesi Selatan.

Putusan No 03/KPPU.JKT.PST Tentang pembatalan Putusan KPPU Perkara Nomor 24/KPPU-I/2009 Tentang Industri Minyak Goreng Sawit di Indonesia.

Putusan No.01/KPPU/2006/PN. Jak. Sel Tentang Pembatalan Putusan KPPU Perkara Nomor: 25/KPPU-I/2009 Tentang Penetapan Harga Fuel Surcharge Dalam Industri Jasa Penerbangan Domestik.

Putusan No.894/Pdt.G/2009/PN.Jkt.Sel Tentang Dikuatkan Putusan KPPU Perkara Nomor 53/KPPU-L/2008 Tentang putusan atas kasus perjanjian pembagian wilayah oleh Asosiasi Kontraktor Listrik dan Mekanikal Indonesia (AKLI) di wilayah Sulawesi Selatan

Putusan PN Surabaya No. 237/Pdt.G/2006.PN.Sby Tentang pembatalan Putusan KPPU Perkara Nomor No. 11/KPPU-I/2005 Tentang perkara distribusi semen Gresik.

Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 906 K/PDT.SUS/2010.

Decision on an Infringement by the Competition Commission, Case Number: MyCC/0003/2012(ACA). Infringement of Section 4 (2) (a) of the Competition Act 2010 by Cameron Highlands Floriculturist Association.

Decision on an Infringement by the Competition Commission, Case Number: MyCC/0003/2012(ACA). Infringement of Section 4 (2) (b) of the Competition Act 2010 by Malaysian Airline System Berhad, AirAsia Berhad and AirAsia X Sdn.Bhd.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46839/lljih.v0i0.249

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Danar Aswim

Creative Commons License
Lex Librum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum  E-ISSN: 2621-9867 | P-ISSN: 2407-3849 is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jl. Animan Achyat (d/h Jln. Sukabangun 2) No. 1610 Kota Palembang Prov. Sumatera Selatan


Lexlibrum has been indexed by:

                       

Tools: