Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Internasional Antara Hukum Indonesia Dan Malaysia Harmonisasinya Dengan Hukum Model Uncitral

Sudarna Sudarna

doi:10.46839/lljih.v11i1.1001

Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Internasional Antara Hukum Indonesia Dan Malaysia Harmonisasinya Dengan Hukum Model Uncitral

Sudarna Sudarna

Abstract

The rapid development of international business can drive good economic growth for a country; on the other hand, the potential for business disputes is also increasing. One of the legal instruments used by subjects of international law is arbitration, whether established by international institutions or states. To conduct international arbitration, it should be under the framework or scheme of international arbitration. The purpose of this research is to compare Indonesian arbitration law with Malaysian arbitration law, which has been adjusted to the framework or scheme of international arbitration. The research results show that Malaysian arbitration law, as regulated in Arbitration Law Number 646 of 2005, is more in line with the international arbitration scheme except in the matter of annulment of international arbitration awards, while Indonesian arbitration law, as regulated in Law Number 30 of 1999, is not yet in line with the international arbitration scheme. Based on this reality, changes are needed to Law Number 30 of 1999, specifically the formation of a law that regulates arbitration and is in line with the framework or scheme of international arbitration.

Keywords

Indonesian Arbitration; Malaysian Arbitration; UNCITRAL Model Law

Full Text:

PDF

References

Hussin, Abdul Aziz. 2009. Undang-Undang Timbang Tara dalam Industri Pembinaan, Pulau Pinang: Universiti Sains Malaysia.

Ainun Najib, (2019). Kepastian Hukum Eksekusi Dan Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Syariah Dalam Perspektif Politik Hukum, Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 26(3).

Bakti Sukwanto & Taufik Siregar. (2010). Pelaksanaan Putusan Arbitrase Internasional di Indonesia, Mercatoria 3 (1).

Cut Memi. (2015). Implementasi Pembatalan Putusan BANI dan Putusan BAPMI oleh Pengadilan Negeri, Jurnal Yudisial 8 (1).

Hendhy Timex. (2013). “Pelaksanaan dan Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase,” Lex Privatum 1 (2).

Hukum Malaysia, Undang-undang Arbitrase 2005 (Akta 646)

Ilhami Ginang Pratidina. (2014). Interpretasi Mahkamah Agung Terhadap Alasan Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Dalam Pasal 70 UU. 30/1999, Jurnal Yuridika 29(3).

M. Khoidin. 2013. Hukum Arbitrase Bidang Perdata. Yogyakarta: Aswaja Pressindo.

Republik Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 Tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa.

Soerjono Soekanto, Sri Mamudji. 2015. Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sri Retno Widyorini. (2006). Penyelesaian Sengketa Dengan Cara Arbitrase, Jurnal Hukum dan Dinamika Masyarakat.

Sudargo Gautama. 1987. Pengantar Hukum Perdata Internasional Indonesia. Bandung: Binacipta.

Sujayadi. (2015). “Patologi dalam Arbitrase Indonesia: Ketentuan Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase dalam Pasal 70 UU No. 30/1999,” Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata (ADHAPER) 1(2).

Tri Ariprabowo dan R. Nazriyah. (2017). Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase oleh Pengadilan dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 15/PUU-XII/2014, Jurnal Konstitusi , 14 (4).

Victor Johannes. (2018). Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Asing di Indonesia Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999, Lex Privatum Volume VII 7.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.46839/lljih.v11i1.1001